The
PowerLabs Linear ElectroMagnetic Accelerator ("Rail Gun",
or "RailGun") research project officially began on
February 21st 2001 when Sam Parler, research Director of Cornell Dubilier
Electronics (CDE), e-mailed me praising me for my experiments with
electrolytic capacitors. The experiments he was referring to all involved
discharging such capacitors at very high rates to produce intense magnetic
fields for
hyperplasic deformation in metal as in the PL Solid
State Can Crusher Page and also accelerating metallic objects by means
of either eddy current induction and subsequent repulsion as in the PL
Disk Shooter, or by ferromagnetic attraction as in both the single
stage gauss gun and the multi stage linear
magnetic accelerator pages. Mr. Parler asked if I had any future
projects in mind, offering to have his company sponsor me a new capacitor bank
(at this time I had recently moved to college and either discarded or left
in storage all of my parts and equipment). This was an offer I could not
refuse: although over the years I had attempted just about every experiment
I could think of with capacitor banks, my previous attempts at building
Rail Guns were never very successful: they would either weld the projectile
to the rails, or blow apart from plasma pressure; never producing enough
force to shoot a projectile. Nonetheless, I still believed that a larger capacitor bank would allow me
to produce a Lorenz force strong enough to accelerate
a metal armature before it
became welded onto the rails.
On his e-mail Mr. Parler mentioned some tests he performed for CDE
where currents as high as
40Kiloamperes were obtained from a single electrolytic capacitor. I found
this very impressive and quickly realized that a capacitor
bank built from such capacitors could perform as well as any other pulse capacitor, and as
such deliver enough power
to successfully accelerate a metal armature in a linear
accelerator design.
Such a capacitor bank would, however, be well
outside of my University student budget. Mr. Parler not only helped me design a capacitor bank
which would fit my request: 3.2kV, 16000Joules (this was actually more
than twice the energy I was hoping for!), and the capability to
deliver a current pulse of up to 100thousand amperes, but also had CDE
pay for all the costs of the bank, hardware and shipping. I can not thank him
and CDE enough for it!
With a preliminary design and a capacitor bank to power it I submitted a research proposal to my departmental
advisor at the Mechanical Engineering/Engineering Mechanics department of
Michigan Technological University. He arranged for me to work at the
Advanced Propulsion Laboratory under Dr. Brad King's supervision. The gun
was built over the summer of 2002 (my first summer in college, still as a
freshmen), in 150 hours of machine shop work and was first fired on October 19th 2002, at
Ressonance Research during the Wisconsin Dells Teslathon. It has been through several upgrades and been
fired numerous times since, including televised shootings for TV6 and The
Discovery Channel, as well as having been featured on 2 newspaper articles
in local Michigan papers.
In 2004 the gun, currently located at the Michigan Technological
University Dynamics research laboratory, has been decommissioned and is
currently being replaced by a new, vastly improved design; The
Rail Gun 2.0...
Project Description and Goals:
The primary objective of this project
was
to
successfully design and construct a linear electromagnetic accelerator
utilizing Lorenz Forces from a high magnitude electrical impulse to propel an
armature down two parallel conducting rails. A simple graphic representation of the
effect is seen on the image to the left; the current flows up on rail,
through the armature which travels perpendicular to the rails, and down the
other rail. The result is a magnetic field between the two rails (B =
2x(u0/2pi)x(I/r)) and an intercepting field by the armature. The rails
repel one another (F = u0I1I2L/2piR) and
they both repel the armature (F = ILB).
Since rails are both fixed the net result is a propulsive force on the
armature, which will be accelerated forward by electromagnetic means (A=ILB/M).
This differs from conventional mass accelerators in that no gases are used, and
it differs from conventional electromagnetic accelerators in that the
field trails behind the projectile at all times; since no coils are used
coupling occurs at a much greater degree and efficiency values would tend
to be higher. The potential velocities achievable can also be much higher.
The accelerating force between the rails and armature depends on the magnetic field
present
(which
in turn is a product of the rail separation distance and the current
through the rails) and on the area this field acts upon. In order for
acceleration to be maximized optimum parameters must be chosen for all
these variables (and others which will be mentioned later). The rail separation distance
was set at twice the electrical
breakdown threshold of air at the peak power supply voltage assuming dry
at air STP; 6mm. The 2x safety
margin was chosen due to dielectric creepage considerations. As far as pulse current
is concerned, it can be seen that in order for a high acceleration to
occur, VERY high currents must be employed, which in turn requires a high
voltage so that circuit impedance can be overcome and the required current
can be achieved. The final design is a series of tradeoffs where higher
voltages bring higher currents but at the cost of a higher rail separation
distance. A typical design utilizes around 4 - 10kV, with higher voltages
being used at higher energies. This particular design calls for a 100kiloampere pulse
which should be accomplished at 3.2kV. Good part of the
many amateur Rail Gun attempts seen on the Internet failed because their
power supplies were simply incapable of supplying the currents required; even
"small" military and research designs employ currents in the 300KA+ range,
with some of the larger guns going over 5 million amperes per pulse.
Acceleration drops off quickly with lower currents and at a certain point
drag becomes higher than accelerating force and the projectile becomes
welded by the resistive heating that occurs. At the same time however, a
very high current will cause dramatic rail erosion and resistive losses. Once the goal of successfully accelerating the armature was achieved
the device was then fine tuned for maximum efficiency so that it can
be used as a platform for investigating the following aspects of
electromagnetic acceleration:
1- Rail Erosion: This is currently
the biggest issue holding back the implementation of linear
electromagnetic accelerators: The very high currents employed to
accelerate the armature must flow through very small contact patches,
which often arc and dissipate a
large portion of the energy available. The resistive heating that occurs
quickly rises the surface temperature well above any metal's vaporization
point, causing extensive erosion. By studying the erosion caused under
different conditions it is hoped that a solution will be found for
maximizing rail life (plasma armatures, different armature compositions,
conductive greases, coatings, lower current pulses, are some of the
options being considered).
2- Capacitor bank Life expectancy: Should a capacitor failure occur it will probably be
due to magnetic forces within the capacitor causing
connections to physically tear due to mechanical motion; in this case it must be
determined at what current this occurs so that a practical limit for the
power supply performance can be determined (3 spare capacitors are
available in case of individual failures).
Also, the capacitance of the
capacitors is expected to increase due to cathode anodization (a
phenomenon only common to electrolytic capacitors subjected to voltage
reversals), and their
ESR will consequently increase due to the dissolution of the resulting
Hydrogen gas into the electrolyte. This will be analyzed through current
waveforms.
Power Supply and pulse shaping:
The power supply consists of 32 Cornell-Dubilier Inverter Grade
capacitors,
each rated at 6300uF and 400V (450V Surge). Operating Temperature is
-40C to +95C. These capacitors utilize the latest technology in
electrolytic capacitor construction to store 640J each in a can measuring
only 3" dia x 5.63" length and weighting 900grams each. To put
in perspective, that is
40 times the amount of energy it takes to electrocute a human in a package
the size of a cola can! The capacitors are assembled in 8
sub banks wired in
series, each bank containing 4 capacitors in parallel, for a total rating
of 3200V nominal,
3.6kV peak charge and 3088.3uF (measured) capacitance. Stored energy (1/2CV^2) is thus 16kJ
nominal, 20kJ at peak charge (see graph).
Each individual capacitor has a 50KOhm 10W wire wound resistor for charge
equalization and also to serve as a bleeder to prevent unwanted charge
buildup when power is switched off. They are charged through a 900Ohm
current limiting resistor and can be safely discharged through a 6.25kOhm
resistor bank mounted inside the bank. The capacitor bank has a measured internal resistance (ESR) of 14.7mOhms
and an internal inductance (ESL) of approximately 1uH. The sub
banks were designed using a Genetic Algorithm program that matches every individually measured capacitance value in such a fashion
that the overall capacitance only varies by 0.02% from the total average
capacitance between each sub bank. The design current is 100kA from
the bank, meaning 25kA per capacitor, with a theoretical
minimum pulse length calculated at 56uS, giving the pulse an
equivalent frequency of approximately (1s/(56uSx2)) 9KHZ, which implies that
the current will only flow on the outer (66/sqrt9000)= 0.7mm of the copper
inter connecting bus bars due to skin effect. In order to counter skin
effect related losses the capacitors are inter connected by very large
surface area (30in^2) oxygen free copper strips each 0.064" thick
(1.6mm). The actual pulse length of the bank was measured at
63.4uS. The bank is currently fitted with a
Fluke 80K6 6-kV probe for voltage monitoring.
To the left some of the inductors experimented with on the
gun can be seen. By adding inductance to the circuit the pulse length can be
increased, making power available for the projectile for a greater duration
of its travel through the rails. At the same time, ohmic heating is
decreased and the heat generated is dissipated over a larger area. It is
expected that an optimum balance exists between the benefits of lower losses
and acceleration over a longer period of time and the drawback of
lower accelerating forces due to the lower currents provided by the
inductor.
Rails, Rail Enclosure and Armature Design:
The rails consist
of two 33.5cm lengths of 6mm thick, 3cm wide
(12x.25x1.76") silver plated oxygen free
copper. This length was chosen to keep resistance and cost at a minimum
whilst still allowing some flexibility in lengthening the electrical
pulse.
Currently the Rail Gun is a "hot rail" design; I.E. the armature acts as
the power switch when it meets the energized rails. For that, the first
two inches of the rails is milled down 1/31th of an inch and covered by a
glass-filled Teflon composite which insulates the rails from the
projectile so as to ensure a stable magnetic field behind it once power
switching takes place. The rails
are held together one on top of the other (wide sides facing, so as to
maximize contact area and magnetic field interaction with the armature
whilst at the same time minimizing contact resistance) by a G-9 (Garolite/Melanite
impregnated inter woven fiberglass)
composite enclosure utilizing
virgin grade Teflon spacers to keep them
parallel to one another at a distance of 6mm. G-9 was
chosen for its exceptional tensile strength (68KSI) and insulating
properties. Teflon spacers were chosen due to the material's
high thermal resistance (one of the highest
working temperatures of any polymer commercially available)
and low coefficient of friction (the lowest known to man). The maximum expected
tensile force between the rails can be estimated by the formula F = u0I^2L/2piR. Using half the
rail thickness as the radius and 100kA as the maximum current through the
rails, and assuming that all the current is carried by the entire length
of the rails the
repulsive force thus becomes F =
((4pi*10^-7)*100000*100000*0.3/2pi*0.002) = 100KN (1Ton). This can
actually become a lot greater during plasma armature tests and with
projectile injection. This force is equally distributed amongst 16 5/16"-24
Grade 8 ultra coated steel bolts, washers and pressure nuts so as to prevent buckling
under the firing forces. Two
armatures were tested: Al1100 25x25x6mm and plasma-backed
Teflon.
Aluminum was chosen being used because it will melt before the rails do,
and thus cut down somewhat on rail erosion. The length of the projectile
was adjusted so that its effect on acceleration efficiency can be
verified. On the Teflon projectile, the aluminum backing becomes a plasma
during the discharge and recycles some of the efficiency losses in the
form of propellant pressure. Unfortunately this
propellant pressure was so great that it ultimately caused the failure of
the rail gun enclosure in multiple places. Thus a new rail gun design was
developed to be able to withstand plasma armature pressures, the
Rail Gun 2.0
Projectile Injection:
If full power was to be applied to a static armature the rails and
whatever was between them would instantaneously melt under the intense
localized heat produced by Ohmic heating as 100thousand amperes tried to
make it through the contact resistance. In order to prevent the Rail Gun
from becoming a spot welder it is necessary that the armature be moving
with some initial speed prior to electromagnetic acceleration. Most
amateur designs fail because of lack of knowledge of this. In this design
the armature is injected by a gas gun consisting of a 1000CC Schedule 80
PVC gas reservoir connected to a 30cm long barrel through a reducer that
goes from 1/2"^2 to
1/4" x 0.6"
through a 60 degree taper. A 1/2" diaphragm pilot operated solenoid valve
controls the gas flow and essentially serves as the trigger for the gun.
Approximately 5% of reservoir capacity is used in one shot. The system is
designed for 500PSI (35ATM), enough to consistently fire a 6 gram aluminum
slug out at 150m/s, or a Teflon slug at 195m/s (634.5fps,
696km/h, 432.6mph). The barrel is an exact replica of the
Rail Gun made from Polycarbonate with
virgin grade Teflon rails for maximum efficiency
and velocity. Currently the injector is being operated with
Nitrogen gas, which, along with decreasing rail oxidation, also has 30%
lower molecular weight than air, providing higher velocities. Ideally the
injection velocity should be as high as possible, as it will allow the
armature to travel the longest distance over powered rails and thus
minimize localized rail erosion and kinetic friction. It would be
desirable for a
future Rail Gun design to employ a supersonic injector.
Charger:
Each individual capacitor in the 20000Joule capacitor bank is fitted with
its own 50kOhm 10W resistor for charge equalization and also to serve as a
bleeder which will drain the capacitor and prevent unwanted charge build
up. These resistors cause the bank to dissipate 130Watts continuously when
held at peak charge. That, and the 20kJ energy storage capability mean
that the charger must output a lot of power to achieve the desired fast
charge rates. The current charger consists in a variable autotransformer (Variac)
and a microwave oven transformer (MOT) charging the capacitors through a
half wave voltage doubler (0.86 capacitor and diode combo). Peak charging
current is 0.8A and peak voltage is 3.5kV. Both are monitored from the
power supply. This approach was chosen because of
low cost, availability and the fact that microwave oven transformers are
current limited, which simplifies the charge circuit significantly. The charging system is further protected by a fast blow 15Ampere
fuse and a current limiting resistor within the Rail Gun. I hope to
replace this with an
inverter-based charger some time in the future.
Completed Device:
To the left is an electrical schematic of the gun. The projectile switching is assumed
lossless and an arbitrary value of 1uH has been assigned to the rails
temporarily. This PSpice 9.0 schematic can simulate the electrical pulse that takes place when the gun discharges and
by comparing the simulation with actual oscilloscope waveforms values for
rail inductance and resistance can be calculated. Then, by
varying the inductance and resistance of the rails I can find the exact
values once the expected and obtained waveforms match up (see Results
below).
The gun has 4 major parts:
The pneumatic injector consisting in an air tank/valve/teflon barrel
assembly, the 20kJ capacitor bank, the Rail Gun per se (rails, enclosure
and spacers), and a high voltage
charger to charge up the 20kJ capacitor bank. Below parts of the gun can
be seen (hover your mouse over the pictures for a description, or
click on them for a full size image):
First the injector/air tank attaches to the
Rail Gun, than the rail gun attaches to the capacitor bank, and finally
the capacitor bank attaches to the charging supply and the tank attaches
to the air compressor or Nitrogen tank at the charging supply.
Below you can see the completed Rail
Gun/Injector/Capacitor bank assembly: Please check
theconstruction
effort page
for pictures and descriptions of how each individual
part was made...
Results!
The Rail Gun circuit has a
measured shortest discharge time (full rail length) of 63.4uS. This is very
close to the 56uS I originally designed the gun for, and means that the peak
power of the discharge will be in the hundreds of Megawatts range (approx.
320MW). Notice the lack of oscillation in the discharge. Discharge current
should be 80 - 90thousand amperes. This power brings with it a whole range
of difficulties, with initial tests causing extensive vaporization of the
projectile and rail damage. It thus became necessary to fit the gun with an
inductor so that the discharge time could be lengthened so as to reduce the
resistive losses and increase acceleration time.
The
frame capture to the left shows the gun
firing with 15kJ and no current limiting inductor; there was extensive rail
and armature erosion, enough to produce a massive plasma cloud that was
fired from the gun and traveled towards its target before extinguishing
itself. The low velocities achieved are an indication that this metal
vaporization is where most of the energy was spent.
The frame capture to the right shows
the gun firing with a plasma armature at 6.5kJ without a current limiting
inductor; the gun is very loud when fired this way. The plasma is a lot
hotter but it lacks sparks; an indication of lower rail erosion.
Clicking on the still frame to the left will download the latest RailGun
test video; a 8.3kJ shot utilizing a pulse lengthening inductor and an
aluminum backed Teflon projectile (plasma armature). Velocities are now
estimated to be supersonic, although the muzzle flash of the gun does not
allow a chronograph to be used to measure its velocity...
More on research objectives:
RailGuns are by far the most spectacular type of
electromagnetic accelerators ever developed. They hold the record for
fastest object accelerated of a significant mass, for the 16000m/s firing
of a .1 gram object by Sandia National Research Laboratories' 6mm Hypervelocity Launcher,
and they can also propel objects of very sizeable masses to equally
impressive velocities, such as in the picture to the left, where Maxwell
Laboratories' 32Megajoule gun fires a 1.6kilogram projectile at 3300m/s
(that's 9megajoules of kinetic energy!) at
Green Farm research facility.
Their ability to propel objects at speeds which are simply impossible for
conventional (chemical or mechanical) means makes them extremely useful
for a range of functions. The most obvious one being defense, where most
of the research money in this area comes from nowadays, but NASA has also
been funding RailGun research for hypervelocity impact simulations
which will allow shields to be developed which will protect orbiting
aircraft from high velocity debris surrounding the earth. NASA is also
researching the possibility of a launcher which would deliver payloads
into orbit at a fraction of the cost of a rocket launch. Similarly, other
studies are under progress for the utilization of RailGuns in Fusion Fuel
pellet Injectors for experimental nuclear fusion reactors, and also for
metallurgical bonding; the University of Texas (UT) in Austin,
identified that the Electromagnetic Powder Deposition (by a railgun) process is
capable of achieving a coating of
deposit material with bond strength equal to the base material while
achieving less than 3% porosity. This should soon become a repair method for jet engine components,
as similar processes are also being employed to produce extremely high
shock pressures on collisions between dissimilar materials in an attempt to
produce new materials.
Rail Gun technology also has the potential to revolutionize
transportation: Sandia National
Laboratories is working on a Segmented Rail
Phased Induction Motor (SERAPHIM), a new type of linear induction motor
offering unique capabilities for high-thrust, high-speed propulsion for
urban maglev transit, advanced monorail, and other forms of high-speed
ground transportation. Linear induction motors are already in use for
applications such as airport transit systems, subway systems, theme park
rides, and industrial material handling systems.
Current Research Status:
After performing over 30 firings, the rail gun enclosure failed due to
excessive in bore pressure from a plasma armature test. As such, it has been
decomissioned and a new RailGun was developed. The PowerLabs RailGun
research continues with this new, improved accelerator. Information on it is
available at the RailGun 2.0 page.
Information on the tests performed with the first Rail Gun, along with
videos, images, and detailed information on its failure are available
through The RailGun Testing Page link.
Future Research:
Ultimately I would desire to be employed in a professional research
where my knowledge and skills displayed here could be put to use so as to
further advance this promising technology. On a more immediate level, my
plans are to take everything learned from this first prototype and build a
second one, maximizing efficiency and minimizing rail erosion and
maintenance costs. This second prototype is already under construction and
can be seen on the Rail Gun 2.0 page. A third
prototype will probably employ advanced power
switching technology, probably solid state (SCR) as well as external
magnetic field augmentation around the rails. It will use a supersonic injector
and a higher
energy storage capacitor bank. The exact specifications of PowerLabs Rail
Gun 3.0 will depend a lot on what is learned from the second prototype, as
well as what funding becomes available by the time that research begins. Any help -financial or otherwise- in designing it and
acquiring the required components is of course welcome.
Below some of the components obtained can be seen: a 5500V, 3000uF, 46000Joule capacitor bank.
Also
seen is a photograph of 12 neodymium N45 grade supermagnets each 2x2" base
with a 2x1" top and one inch high. These are the strongest magnets I have
ever seen; in one word, they are Dangerous. Strong enough to crush
fingers, drive metal objects through soft wood, or explode on impact when two
are released together. I will be employing their fantastic field strength as
external field augmentation for higher efficiencies in Rail Gun 2.0. They
have been sponsored by Engineered
Concepts; the cheapest and best magnet supplier on the 'net!
Construction, Plans, Schematics, How-To, FAQ:
Due to overwhelming demand for plans and schematics for the gun I may
some day, time permitting, put together an amateur Rail Gun design and
construction manual. This particular gun took 150 hours of design and
construction work before it could finally be fired and although specific
plans are not available at the time, a complete and detailed log of the
construction effort, including pictures and videos, is available for free at
the Rail Gun Construction Effort page.
Information on the tests performed and cause of failure is available at the
Rail Gun Testing Page.
For current information on PowerLabs' RailGun research Project go to the
PowerLabs Railgun 2.0 page.
[ Back ][ Home ][ Up ][ Next ]
Comments? Mail me. People have visited this page since 21/02/02. Last updated
02/11/07